KCH-A54-1/1-2019

Chieng Hock Ing

---

Tay Teck Siong

(a) That the Magistrates’ Court Suit No.KCH-A72NCC-884/7-2018 filed at the Magistrates’ Court at Kuching be transferred to the Sessions Court at Kuching; and (b) There be no order as to costs. The further grounds of this application are set out in the Affidavit in Support of Chieng Hock Ing filed together herein.

13-05-2020

Ruling This court finds that the Plaintiffs have prove their case on the balance of probabilities. Therefore, the Plaintiffs’ claim is allowed as per in the ruling with interest and costs. The Defendant’s counterclaim is dismissed with costs to the plaintiffs.

KCH-B52NCvC-25/8-2017

Syarikat Khoon Seng Trading

---

Liew Say Leoon

The Plaintiff’s claim against the 1st and 2nd Defendants are for the price of goods and materials supplied and delivered by the Plaintiff to the 1st and 2nd Defendants at the 1st and 2nd Defendants’ request. The total amount due and owing by the 1st and 2nd Defendants in its account with the Plaintiff is in the sum of RM252,907.52 together with interest in the sum of RM162,174.19, as at 19th July, 2017, full particulars whereof have been delivered to the 1st and 2nd Defendants

12-03-2020

Ruling at the end of the trial. Plaintiff's claim as per soc allowed with cost. Counter claim dismissed with cost.

KCH-B52NCC-17/5-2019

Ngie Hin (bintulu) Sdn Bhd

---

Omega Sakti Sdn Bhd

A. the sum of RM343,340.36 as at 22.4.2019; B. interest on the sum of RM274,443.60 at the rate of 1.5% per month from 23.4.2019 until full and final settlement or at such other rate as this Honourable Court deems fit; C. costs; D. such further or other relief as this Honourable Court deems fit.

31-01-2020

Ruling. The court find that there is no triable issue in the defence that needs the matter to go for trial. In the circumstances, I allow the application and enter a judgment as per the statement of claim with cost of RM2500.00

KCH-64FOP-4/3-2019

Jabatan Peguam Negara Malaysia Sarawak

---

Mohd Munawar Mohd Azizan

Seksyen 32(2) Akta Dadah Berbahaya (Perlucuthakan Harta) 1988 (Akta 340).

30-01-2020

Finding of the court. In the circumstances, I find that the claimants have successfully rebutted the presumption under section 35 of the Act. The motorcycle is directed to be returned to CW1 as the lawful owner.

KCH-62D-22/12-2018

Public Prosecutor

---

Syally Jaharah Binti Othman AND OTHERS

SEKSYEN 39A (2) AKTA DADAH BERBAHAYA 1952

22-01-2020

Ruling at the end of the prosecution case. This court finds that the prosecution has failed to prove a prima facie case for the two charges. All the accused in the case no. KCH-62D-22/12-2018 are discharged and acquitted without their defence being called. The first accused in the case No. KCH-29 83D-1703/11-2018 is also discharged and acquitted without her defence being called.

KCH-62RS-7/3-2019

Pdrm (jsj)

---

Rufika Bin Mohamad Hamdan

under Section 394 of the Penal Code and to be read together with section 34 of the same code.

14-01-2020

Ruling at the end of defence call. The accused sentence to an imprisonment term of 10 years with 3 stroke of rattans.The imprisonment date to commence from the date of arrest.

KCH-62EG-1/4-2019

Malaysia Maritim Enforcement Agency

---

Nyuyen Van Dai AND OTHERS

Offence under paragraph15(1)(a) Fisheries Act 1985 and read together with subsection 24(1) Fisheries Act 1985 and punishable under paragraph 25(a) read together with paragraph 52(1)(a) of the same Act.

14-01-2020

Ruling at the end of prosecution’s case. The prosecution has failed to prove a prima facie case against all the accused.Therefore, I order the accused to be discharged and acquitted.

KCH-62EG-4/5-2019

Malaysia Maritim Enforcement Agency

---

Le Van Phuong AND OTHERS

Offence under paragraph 15(1)(a) of the Fisheries Act 1985 read together with subsection 24(1) of the Fisheries Act 1985 and punishable under paragraph 25(a) read together with paragraph 52(1)(a) of the same Act.

10-12-2019

Decision at the end of defence stage.The master i.e. the 1st accused sentence to a fine of RM400,000.00 i/d 6 months imprisonment. As for the rest of the accused(2nd accused to 23rd accused) are sentence to a fine of RM50,000.00 i/d 6 month imprisonment.

KCH-62D-4/3-2019

Pdrm

---

Fakhrullah Aqmal Bin Mohamad Roslan AND OTHERS

Section 6B (1) (a) of the Dangerous Drug Act 1952 Section 39A(1) of the Dangerous Drug Act 1952

02-12-2019

Ruling at the end of prosecution's case, This court found out that the prosecution has failed to prove a prima facie case against all the accused person. In the circumstances, all the accused persons are discharged and acquitted without their defence being called.

KCH-63-36/3-2018

Cawangan Penguatkuasa Farmasi

---

Sim Peng Chuan

Peraturan 18A(15) Peraturan-Peraturan Kawalan Dadah dan Kosmetik 1984.

08-11-2019

Having considered the evidence adduced on a maximum evaluation basis, court finds that the prosecution has failed to prove a prima facie case on the charge preferred. The accused is hereby Discharged and Acquitted without calling for his defence. Exhibit (P3-P24) to be disposed by the prosecution after lapse of appeal period. Full grounds will be provided on appeal.